Yes.
But even if I believed that Obama supported the people of Egypt ‘in his heart,’ that would not stop me from criticizing him. Politicians are defined almost entirely by policy and actions. If his intentions are not reflected in his actions, then what’s the point in referring to them? Even if Obama turns out to be a ‘good guy’ on the inside, trapped by the limitations of the presidency, it shouldn’t matter to our assessment of his administration unless he actively tries to change or overcome those limitations in a positive way. Since he’s not doing that, I really don’t see the value in speculating as to what his internal motivations are.
Ralph Nader challenges Obama at the University of Buffalo Law School
This prediction was made in early November- a quite accurate foreshadowing of Obama’s tax proposal.
One of the main uses of the material support statute, I think is to demonize organizations that the U.S. government doesn’t like. Had they had such a statue during the period of the African National Congress (ANC) opposition to the apartheid government in South Africa, they would have labeled that—and that’s how they thought of it in the U.S., under Reagan and before—as a terrorist organization. Any contacts with the ANC of any Americans opposed to apartheid would have been considered criminal.
There are two aspects to this. One is that the government can label, without any kind of hearing or way to challenge it, a foreign organization as a terrorist organization. The other is that any American contact with that organization or support for that organization is prohibited.
In an exclusive extract from his new book ‘The Empire’s New Clothes’. Paul Street argues that the failings of the Obama administration could be easily predicted based on his campaign and initial statements on the night of his election.
Election Night Comments
Obama’s comments on the night of his election were loaded with warnings of progressive betrayals to come.
“Anyone Out There Who Still Doubts the Power of Our Democracy”
Citizens were given warning of audacious, privilege, and power-friendly deception and policy to come by Obama’s interesting election-night speech. The first public words out of President-elect Obama’s mouth on the evening of his election were revealing. “If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible … who still questions the power of our democracy,” Obama intoned, “tonight is your answer.” The supposed “left” president-elect’s first statement was NOT a call for peace, justice, and equality. It was a declaration bolstering the American plutocracy’s claim that the United States—the industrialized world’s most unequal and wealth-top-heavy society by far—is home to a great democracy and limitless opportunity for all.
note: this blog has no affiliation with the New Left Project, apart from common political slant.