On Window-Smashing
Pittsburgh’s protesters have every reason to be mad at the G20 as the conference commences. These leaders represent the global economic hegemony, and the economic hierarchy they perpetuate is a stage in history that must come to an end.
The methods of the protesters, however, compromise their message. I have no problem with what others call “violence” against property, but I must call its effectiveness into question. Presently, at the very least, a majority of Americans see such acts as dangerous and radical. The message of such protesters, however intellectually robust and morally sound, will fall on deaf ears.
I have no desire to play by the capitalists’ rules, and I have no respect for any law passed to protect property acquired through dispossession. But direct action is not a uniformly good thing. I have the utmost respect for workers who go on strike or refuse to vacate their factories, but I hate to see those with whom I share political goals wasting their efforts on smashing storefronts. This harms the ruling class no more than a fly on a businessman’s arm. It may draw attention to the cause, but not all press is good press. The left’s efforts are much better spent on agitation and strikes.